BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balan, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Vinjamuri, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balan, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Vinjamuri, S.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 70, Issue 832 338-340, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

The value of ventilation-perfusion imaging in pregnancy

KK Balan, M Critchley, KK Vedavathy, ML Smith and S Vinjamuri
Regional Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major cause of maternal death during pregnancy. The aims of this retrospective study were to review 5 years experience of ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) imaging in pregnancy, to evaluate the effect of the V/Q scan report on the referring clinician's use of anticoagulants and to monitor the course and outcome of pregnancy. 82 patients (aged 17-44 years, gestation 6-40 weeks) underwent V/Q imaging for suspected PE, over a 5 year period. Modified PIOPED criteria were used to assess the probability of PE. 31 patients were shown to have normal scans (38%); 19 (23%) had low probability (LP) scans; 14 (17%) had intermediate probability (IP) scans and 18 (22%) had high probability (HP) scans for PE. Referring clinicians saw the reports and took action within 12 h. Anticoagulation was continued or started in 31 patients (all HP, 12 IP and 1 LP). Anticoagulation was considered unnecessary in 52 patients (all normal, 19 LP and 2 IP). None of the patients with normal or LP scans had documented PE during the follow-up period (median 25 months, range 3-60 months). No complications of anticoagulation were observed and no adverse outcome of pregnancy were reported. V/Q imaging is a valuable technique in the management of pregnant women suspected of having PE.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
T. C. Krivak and K. K. Zorn
Venous Thromboembolism in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2007; 109(3): 761 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Matthews
Imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: what is the most appropriate imaging protocol?
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 79(941): 441 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. T. Winer-Muram, J. M. Boone, H. L. Brown, S. G. Jennings, W. C. Mabie, and G. T. Lombardo
Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnant Patients: Fetal Radiation Dose with Helical CT
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 487 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1997 by the British Institute of Radiology.