BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1996) 69, 1089-1098
© 1996 British Institute of Radiology
doi:

Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strickland, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strickland, N. H.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 69, Issue 828 1089-1098, Copyright © 1996 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Review article: some cost-benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective

NH Strickland
Department of Imaging, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.

Some cost-benefit considerations for a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) are discussed in relation to a hospital-wide PACS. The acquisition of plain radiography by phosphor f2p4ing plate technology (currently state of the art computed radiography), the soft copy display of the clinical history and radiological reports in association with the corresponding images, and the retrieval and simultaneous display of past with current images, are all considered to be integral to a true PACS. Cost-benefit considerations for a PACS extend far beyond the purely economic issues. More important and far reaching consequences relate to efficient data management provided by a PACS properly interfaced to hospital and radiological information systems. The hardware required to install and operate a hospital-wide PACS is now ubiquitously available and its performance has been amply demonstrated by a number of filmless hospitals. Software design and implementation is now the outstanding consideration determining the clinical and, in particular, the radiological benefit of a PACS.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
N. H Strickland
Current topic: PACS (picture archiving and communication systems): filmless radiology
Arch. Dis. Child., July 1, 2000; 83(1): 82 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J.-C. Oberson, R. Welz, and L. Bovisi
Development of an Electronic Radiologist's Office in a Private Institute
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2000; 20(2): 573 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. M. Pomerantz, C. S. White, T. L. Krebs, B. Daly, S. A. Sukumar, F. Hooper, and E. L. Siegel
Liver and Bone Window Settings for Soft-Copy Interpretation of Chest and Abdominal CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 311 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. R. Gale, M. E. Gale, R. K. Schwartz, V. V. Muse, and R. E. Walker
An Automated PACS Workstation Interface: A Timesaving Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 33 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Hawnaur
Recent advances: Diagnostic radiology
BMJ, July 17, 1999; 319(7203): 168 - 171.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1996 by the British Institute of Radiology.