BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1996) 69, 555-562
© 1996 British Institute of Radiology
doi:

Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rust, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rust, A.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 69, Issue 822 555-562, Copyright © 1996 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Dose and image quality in mammography with an automatic beam quality system

KC Young, ML Ramsdale and A Rust
Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County & St Luke's Hospitals, Guildford, UK.

Radiation dose, contrast and image quality for automatic beam quality selection (OPDOSE) with the Siemens Mammomat 3000 has been investigated for different breast thicknesses and compared with those found using manually set tube potentials and a molybdenum target and filter. Automatic beam quality selection was found to have a negligible effect for breasts with a compressed breast thickness of less than 45 mm. However, for larger breasts substantial dose savings were achieved for a loss in contrast. For mammograms of compressed breast with a thickness in excess of 60 mm the mean glandular dose (MGD) per film was 2.90 mGy for manually selected tube potentials with a molybdenum/molybdenum target filter combination as compared with 1.87 mGy using 26 kVp and a tungsten target with rhodium filtration. The contrast loss in using OPDOSE was measured with a test object to be about 10% for breast thicknesses in excess of 45 mm. The standard breast model, which assumes a 50% glandular content, did not provide a good fit to the MGD for women attending for breast screening in the age range 50 to 64 years.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. L. Smathers, J. M. Boone, L. J. Lee, E. A. Berns, R. A. Miller, and A. M. Wright
Radiation Dose Reduction for Augmentation Mammography
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1414 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K C Young
Radiation doses in the UK trial of breast screening in women aged 40-48 years
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2002; 75(892): 362 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1996 by the British Institute of Radiology.