BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1996) 69, 262-265
© 1996 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-819-262

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merkle, E
Right arrow Articles by Brambs, H-J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merkle, E
Right arrow Articles by Brambs, H-J

Computer assisted determination of the dose-area product in retrograde urethrography

E Merkle, MD 1 A J Aschoff, MD 1 M Muller, MD 2 J Merk, MD 1 and H-J Brambs, MD 1

1 University of Ulm, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Stemhovelstr 9, 89075 Ulm 2 Department of Urology, University Clinic Steglitz, Free University of Berlin, Menckenstr 24, 12169 Berlin, Germany

Retrograde urethrography (RUG) is a dynamic radiological procedure in which the cumulative dose–area product (DAP) comprises radiation doses derived from both fluoroscopy and radiography. In the present prospective study, digital retrograde urethrographs (Prestilix 1600X/DRS, General Electric) were obtained in 40 consecutive male patients (mean age 60.6 years, range 23–88 years) presenting for evaluation of urinary pathology. The radiation dose was recorded as the dose–area product. From these data, a computer program (Diasoft 2 0, PTW, Freiburg, Germany) then determined the respective proportions of the total radiation dose deriving from fluoroscopy and radiography, as well as the number of radiographic exposures. The average total radiation dose was 316 cGy cm2. In five of the 40 patients examined (12 5%), the number of radiographic exposures registered by the program and, hence, the calculated DAPs were erroneous. In the remaining 35 patients, the average proportion of the cumulative DAP resulting from fluoroscopy was 81%, while that deriving from radiography was 19%. The computer program utilized in this study makes possible an intelligent evaluation of the DAP in dynamic procedures such as RUG. Since fluoroscopy is responsible for 81% of the cumulative DAP at RUG, a significant decrease in applied radiation dose may be achieved by reducing fluoroscopy time or by using pulsed fluoroscopy.

Received for publication August 24, 1995. Revision received November 13, 1995. Accepted for publication November 17, 1995.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R S Livingstone, C G Koshy, and D V Raj
Evaluation of work practices and radiation dose during adult micturating cystourethrography examinations performed using a digital imaging system
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 77(923): 927 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1996 by the British Institute of Radiology.