BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Radiology (1996) 69, 148-152
© 1996 British Institute of Radiology
doi:
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nassivera, E.
Right arrow Articles by Nardin, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nassivera, E.
Right arrow Articles by Nardin, L.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 69, Issue 818 148-152, Copyright © 1996 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Daily quality control programme in mammography

E Nassivera and L Nardin
Department of Medical Physics, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.

The Medical Physics Department of S. Chiara Hospital (Trento, Italy) has developed, promoted and organized a quality control programme in mammography in the Department of Diagnostic Radiology. The aim of this paper is to describe the procedure for daily quality control carried out by the radiological technologist and analysed by the medical physicist, and also to discuss some interesting results obtained in the various departments during 1994. A sensitometric strip provides the film characteristic parameters to meet the requirements of DIN 6868 Part II (base plus fog level, average gradient, relative speed, maximum density, speed index and contrast index). A test phantom radiograph provides information on the detection of microcalcifications and simulated tumours (high and low contrast resolution) as well as on the central background density and the contrast. The exposure time-current product, mAs, needed to expose the phantom is always noted. Characteristic parameters of the two systems are compared with limiting values given by International Protocols or with the permissible ranges calculated in advance. It has been possible to discover variations in the performance of mammographic and automatic processing units due to the quality control programme. In one department, for example, the malfunctioning of the automatic exposure control device was observed. In another, replacement of mammography films and the automatic processing unit resulted in a better image quality.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A D Dimakopoulou, I A Tsalafoutas, E K Georgiou, and E N Yakoumakis
Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2006; 79(938): 123 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1996 by the British Institute of Radiology.