BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1995) 68, 1185-1189
© 1995 British Institute of Radiology
doi:

Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groell, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mischinger, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groell, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mischinger, H. J.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 68, Issue 815 1185-1189, Copyright © 1995 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Quantitative perfusion parameters of focal nodular hyperplasia and normal liver parenchyma as determined by electron beam tomography

R Groell, C Kugler, M Aschauer, R Rienmueller, R Stauber, M Trauner and HJ Mischinger
Department of Radiology, University of Graz, Austria.

Eight patients with known focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) were studied by electron beam tomography (EBT) in a multisection flow mode at defined time intervals after intravenous contrast agent injection. Various regions of interest (ROIs) were defined in the areas of FNH, normal liver parenchyma, aorta and portal vein. In each ROI density changes were measured and plotted against time. In those time-density curves (TDCs) the slope, the time of maximal enhancement and the absolute density value of peak enhancement were determined. Arterial tissue perfusion was calculated for normal liver parenchyma and FNH. In all eight patients significant differences in peak density (123.88 +/- 18.92 HU vs 102.5 +/- 15.49 HU, p = 0.012), in the rate of arterial contrast enhancement (252.63 +/- 28.05 HU min-1 vs 38.88 +/- 4.19 HU min-1, p = 0.012) and in the arterial tissue perfusion (1.36 +/- 0.19 ml min-1 cm-3 vs 0.21 +/- 0.03 ml min-1 cm-3, p = 0.012) between FNH and normal liver parenchyma were found. Perfusion values of normal liver parenchyma correspond to those determined by inert gas clearance. Further studies will determine the practicability of this quantitative method in the evaluation of global and other focal liver diseases.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. V. Sahani, N.-S. Holalkere, P. R. Mueller, and A. X. Zhu
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CT Perfusion of Liver and Tumor Tissue--Initial Experience
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 736 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. V. Sahani, S. P. Kalva, L. M. Hamberg, P. F. Hahn, C. G. Willett, S. Saini, P. R. Mueller, and T.-Y. Lee
Assessing Tumor Perfusion and Treatment Response in Rectal Cancer with Multisection CT: Initial Observations
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 785 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Ruppert-Kohlmayr, M. M. Uggowitzer, C. Kugler, D. Zebedin, G. Schaffler, and G. S. Ruppert
Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatocellular Adenoma of the Liver: Differentiation with Multiphasic Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176(6): 1493 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1995 by the British Institute of Radiology.