BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1995) 68, 1074-1082
© 1995 British Institute of Radiology
doi:

Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wraith, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Farquhar, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wraith, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Farquhar, B.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 68, Issue 814 1074-1082, Copyright © 1995 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

An investigation into techniques for reducing doses from neo-natal radiographic examinations

CM Wraith, CJ Martin, EJ Stockdale, S McDonald and B Farquhar
Bio-Medical Physics and Bio-Engineering Department, Aberdeen Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.

A survey of radiation doses received by infants having radiography in a neo-natal unit was undertaken at Aberdeen Maternity Hospital. Options for dose reduction recommended by the CEC Lake Starnberg Group were investigated. Techniques were implemented for clinical evaluation after assessments of image quality with test objects and phantoms. Clinical image quality of radiographs was evaluated by paediatric radiologists using CEC criteria. Results revealed a clear relationship between entrance dose and patient weight, indicating that reference doses for infants could be linked to weight. At the start of the study the mean entrance dose for chest anteroposterior (AP) radiographs was 65 microGy and the dose-area product 12.3 mGy cm2 for a system with 2.5 mm aluminum filtration using 50 kVp X-rays with a 200 speed class film/screen system. A 400 speed class film/screen combination was investigated but not evaluated clinically, because the image quality was not considered acceptable. Addition of 0.1 mm copper to the filtration of the X-ray tube reduced entrance doses by 50%, but the technique was not adopted, because of a poorer image quality with only 72% of features in clinical images being reproduced to an acceptable standard, compared with 87% with the original system. Use of faster processing chemicals, an increase in filtration to 3.5 mm aluminium and a tube potential of 60 kVp resulted in a 40% reduction in mean entrance dose to 37 microGy with satisfactory clinical image quality.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S J Mutch and S D P Wentworth
Imaging the neonate in the incubator: an investigation of the technical, radiological and nursing issues
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 902 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E D Dougeni, H B Delis, A A Karatza, C P Kalogeropoulou, S G Skiadopoulos, S P Mantagos, and G S Panayiotakis
Dose and image quality optimization in neonatal radiography
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2007; 80(958): 807 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D G W Onnasch, F K Schroder, G Fischer, and H-H Kramer
Diagnostic reference levels and effective dose in paediatric cardiac catheterization
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): 177 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D G W Onnasch, A Schemm, and H-H Kramer
Optimization of radiographic parameters for paediatric cardiac angiography
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2004; 77(918): 479 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
L Duggan, H Warren-Forward, T Smith, and T Kron
Investigation of dose reduction in neonatal radiography using specially designed phantoms and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2003; 76(904): 232 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C I Armpilia, I A J Fife, and P L Croasdale
Radiation dose quantities and risk in neonates in a special care baby unit
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2002; 75(895): 590 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J V Cook
Radiation protection and quality assurance in paediatric radiology
Imaging, December 1, 2001; 13(4): 229 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N F Jones, T W Palarm, and I S Negus
Neonatal chest and abdominal radiation dosimetry: a comparison of two radiographic techniques
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2001; 74(886): 920 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1995 by the British Institute of Radiology.