BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Radiology (1995) 68, 862-869
© 1995 British Institute of Radiology
doi:
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shekhdar, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shekhdar, J.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 68, Issue 812 862-869, Copyright © 1995 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Interval cancers in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme

AE Johnson and J Shekhdar
Breast Study Centre, Mount Vernon and Watford Hospitals NHS Trust, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK.

The National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme defines objectives with acceptable and, where possible, achievable standards. This paper examines the problem of interval cancers. Slopes due to shrinkage of primary breast cancers in response to primary systemic therapy are used as surrogates for growth slopes. From the distribution of these slopes the proportion of tumours which might reach particular sizes in any time interval may be estimated. For specific differences in size between screen and clinical detection levels the number of interval cancers which could appear in 1, 2 and 3 years after screening is estimated. The justification for these predictions is evaluated. The literature in relation to growth is reviewed; we add three growth slopes from our own measurements. The range of volume doubling times and volume halving times is the same whereas the mean value derived from the literature is about 90 days in contrast to only 26 days for inferred growth rates. Because of the difficulties inherent in the measurement of growth, it is concluded that the literature defines the left half of a distribution; the right hand side is completed by shrinkage data. The observed rates for interval cancers from different sources vary widely; there is an underlying assumption that interval cancers are an index of failure. These calculations suggest that there is an irreducible minimum of interval cancers, which will depend upon the screening interval and the size at which tumours are detected. The interval cancers will contain more poorly differentiated tumours. The anticipated achievable standards appear to be over optimistic.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
H. Goodare, M. King, M. Baum, A. Johnson, J. Shekhdar, N E Day, R. Boer, H. de Koning, A. Threlfall, C. Woodman, et al.
NHS breast screening programme
BMJ, February 6, 1999; 318(7180): 397a - 397.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1995 by the British Institute of Radiology.