BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1995) 68, 547-548
© 1995 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-809-547-b

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, R A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, R A

Potential gonadal dose from leakage radiation?

R A Nicholson

Department of Clinical Physics St Mary's Hospital Praed Street London W2 1NY

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

The Guidance Notes [1] allow leakage radiation air kerma rates of up to 1 mGy h–1 at a distance of 1 m, through the housing of X-ray tubes; though it is recommended that leakage radiation should not exceed one-tenth of this value in practice. There is no dispute that for overhead tubes the existing limits are acceptable, particularly as leakage dose rates from most of these tubes are orders of magnitude below the required level. In my own experience, however, the highest leakage radiation measurements are to be found in mobile image intensifier (II) units. Bearing in mind some of the uses to which these theatre II units are put, the question of whether the limits for leakage radiation are really adequate should be raised.

Received for publication November 30, 1994. Revision received January 4, 1995. Accepted for publication January 16, 1995.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1995 by the British Institute of Radiology.