BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Radiology (1995) 68, 508-514
© 1995 British Institute of Radiology
doi:
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, S.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 68, Issue 809 508-514, Copyright © 1995 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Analysis of patient doses for myelogram and discogram examinations and their reduction through changes in equipment set-up

CJ Martin and S Hunter
Department of Bio-Medical Physics and Bio-Engineering, Aberdeen Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, Foresterhill, UK.

Patient doses for myelogram and discogram examinations performed on two C-arm X-ray units have been measured using dose-area product meters. Contributions to the dose from fluoroscopy and radiography have been obtained from analysis of results for a selection of examinations. Information was recorded about the individual beam projections used, in order to allow estimates of effective dose. Effective doses for lumbar myelograms were 3-4 mSv and for cervical myelograms and discograms were 1 mSv. The doses on the two units were similar, but contributions from the various parts of the examinations were different. Quality assurance (QA) measurements of dose variables were used to determine reasons for these differences in performance. Fluoroscopic doses are influenced by image intensifier dose rate and by the way in which exposure factor selection has been set up for the automatic exposure control (AEC) system. Doses from digital fluorography on units for specialized applications may be greater than those with standard film/screen systems. Recommendations have been made concerning ways in which doses on each unit might be reduced. Detailed assessments of doses resulting from AEC set-up options, made during QA tests, can help to ensure that the optimum balance between patient dose and image quality is achieved.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1995 by the British Institute of Radiology.