BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1995) 68, 502-507
© 1995 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-809-502

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castellano, A
Right arrow Articles by Raphael, M J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castellano, A
Right arrow Articles by Raphael, M J

Assessment of organ radiation doses and associated risk for digital bifemoral arteriography

A Castellano 1 J G McNeill 2 N C Thorp 1,* D R Dance 1 and M J Raphael 3

1 Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK 2 Vascular Radiology Service, Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust, London SW3 6NP, UK 3 Department of Imaging, The Middlesex Hospital, London W1N 8AA, UK

An assessment has been made of the absorbed dose associated with femoral arteriography using a digital imaging system. A bilateral femoral arteriogram was performed on 17 patients, using a filmless 1024 matrix digital image acquisition system with a discrete stepping tube-stand and 40 cm image intensifies A standardized protocol of manual patient/tube-stand positioning under fluoroscopic control and automatic stepping digital acquisition was followed. Skin entry doses were measured with a dose–area product meter for each stage of the procedure, and the total gonad dose was assessed with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Published Monte Carlo simulations were supplemented with further calculations to evaluate organ doses from the dose–area products measured. Comparison with the TLD measurements indicated that this technique overestimated organ doses by about 30%. A mean effective dose of 3.1 ± 1.8 mSv was calculated for the procedure, with the greatest dose burden being imposed by fluoroscopy during catheter manipulation. The related radiation detriment is 0.018%, which is insignificant when compared with the overall mortality from peripheral vascular disease.

* Current address: Medical Physics Department, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2QG, UK.

Received for publication October 7, 1994. Revision received December 20, 1994. Accepted for publication January 12, 1995.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D Bor, T Sancak, T Olgar, Y Elcim, A Adanali, U Sanlidilek, and S Akyar
Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2004; 77(916): 315 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1995 by the British Institute of Radiology.