BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1995) 68, 450-453
© 1995 British Institute of Radiology
doi:

Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cornford, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Blamey, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cornford, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Blamey, R. W.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 68, Issue 809 450-453, Copyright © 1995 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Mammographic features of invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a comparative analysis

EJ Cornford, AR Wilson, E Athanassiou, M Galea, IO Ellis, CW Elston and RW Blamey
Department of Radiology, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.

The mammographic appearances of 86 invasive lobular carcinomas were compared with those of 86 invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type matched for age, size and stage. There was no significant difference in the frequency of a mammographic abnormality consistent with malignancy between the lobular carcinoma (90%) and ductal carcinoma (96%) groups. A spiculate mass was the commonest feature in both groups (69% and 63%, respectively). There were no differences in the imaging features of masses in the two groups. In the lobular carcinoma group any mammographic abnormality was more likely to be seen on only one view and calcifications were less frequently observed. Multiple lesions were more frequent in the ductal carcinoma group. However, although these differences appeared to reach statistical significance, as they were only apparent in a study with a large number of comparisons, it is unlikely that these differences are practically significant. Analysis of the lobular invasive group failed to demonstrate any significant differences in the imaging features of the classical and mixed sub-types, a spiculate mass being the most common single abnormality in both. No mammographic differences of practical use to distinguish invasive lobular from invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type were demonstrated.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1995 by the British Institute of Radiology.