BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1995) 68, 296-300
© 1995 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-807-296

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, R A
Right arrow Articles by Akpan, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, R A
Right arrow Articles by Akpan, M

Radiation dose reduction in paediatric fluoroscopy using added filtration

R A Nicholson, BSc, MSc A Thornton, DMRD, FRCR and M Akpan, DCRR

Department of Radiology, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK

Studies on a water phantom indicate that the insertion of extra tube filtration combined with the removal of the antiscatter grid can reduce the total energy imparted from paediatric fluoroscopy by a factor of more than four when automatic exposure control is used. The omission of the grid is responsible for up to 40% of the reduction while the addition of 0.7 mm steel filtration is found to account for a further reduction in energy imparted of between 57% and 70%, for depths of water simulating small patients of 6–16 cm thickness. For all contrast paediatric examinations the reduction in image quality was considered to be small and the diagnostic information unimpaired with the filter in place.

Received for publication January 19, 1994. Accepted for publication September 13, 1994.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
M Alcaraz, M. Garcia-Vera, L. Bravo, Y Martinez-Beneyto, D Armero, J. Morant, and M Canteras
Collimator with filtration compensator: clinical adaptation to meet European Union recommendation 4F on radiological protection for dental radiography
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2009; 38(6): 413 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. L. Ward, C. E. Barnewolt, K. J. Strauss, R. L. Lebowitz, V. Venkatakrishnan, M. Stehr, D. L. McLellan, C. A. Peters, D. Zurakowski, P. S. Dunning, et al.
Radiation Exposure Reduction during Voiding Cystourethrography in a Pediatric Porcine Model of Vesicoureteral Reflux
Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 96 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D J Gallacher, A Mackenzie, S Batchelor, J Lynch, and J E Saunders
Use of a quality index in threshold contrast detail detection measurements in television fluoroscopy
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2003; 76(907): 464 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J V Cook
Radiation protection and quality assurance in paediatric radiology
Imaging, December 1, 2001; 13(4): 229 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A J Reilly and D G Sutton
A computer model of an image intensifier system working under automatic brightness control
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2001; 74(886): 938 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1995 by the British Institute of Radiology.