| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regional Medical Physics Department, Newcastle General Hospital, Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK
In mammography, it is important that the maximum amount of diagnostic information is obtained from each radiograph. One of the factors influencing image quality is the optical density of the film. In this study, a contrast–detail test object was used to establish the optimum optical density value on the basis of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for two mammographic film–screen combinations under particular processing conditions. The optimum optical density, taken as being the point at which the threshold contrast is a minimum varied little with detail size. The optimum optical density for the Fuji film–screen combination with Photosol chemistry was found to be higher than that for the Kodak film–screen combination and Kodak processing conditions studied. Although the actual values of optical density are specific to the fixed processing conditions encountered, the technique has more general applicability.
Received for publication January 26, 1994. Revision received September 20, 1994. Accepted for publication September 30, 1994.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A D Dimakopoulou, I A Tsalafoutas, E K Georgiou, and E N Yakoumakis Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2006; 79(938): 123 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bosmans, A.-K. Carton, F. Rogge, F. Zanca, J. Jacobs, C. Van Ongeval, K. Nijs, A. Van Steen, and G. Marchal Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 120 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I A Tsalafoutas, A D Dimakopoulou, E D Koulentianos, A N Serefoglou, and E N Yakoumakis Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2004; 77(920): 666 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Lewin, R. E. Hendrick, C. J. DOrsi, P. K. Isaacs, L. J. Moss, A. Karellas, G. A. Sisney, C. C. Kuni, and G. R. Cutter Comparison of Full-Field Digital Mammography with Screen-Film Mammography for Cancer Detection: Results of 4,945 Paired Examinations Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 873 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |