BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1994) 67, 524-529
© 1994 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-798-524

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buckenham, T M
Right arrow Articles by Coles, G S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buckenham, T M
Right arrow Articles by Coles, G S

Digital sialography: imaging and intervention

T M Buckenham, FRACR (NZ) 1 C D George, FRCS, FRCR 1 D McVicar, MRCP, FRCR 2 A R Moody, MRCP, FRCR 3 and G S Coles, HDCR 1

1 Department of Radiology, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London SW17 OQT, UK 2 Department of Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK 3 Department of Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Close, Leicester L1 5WN, UK

Digital subtraction imaging (DSI) has been widely used in angiography but less commonly applied to sialography. Over a 3-year period 109 patients referred for sialography, 42 males and 67 females with a mean age of 44 years (range 8–85 years), were examined using a digital subtraction imaging technique. 13 patients went on to have an interventional procedure, stone removal or duct dilatation. The role of DSI imaging in sialography and its use in facilitating interventional procedures on the salivary glands are discussed.

Received for publication September 22, 1993. Revision received December 8, 1993. Accepted for publication December 23, 1993.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J HUGILL, E SALA, K G HOLLINGSWORTH, and D J LOMAS
MR sialography: the effect of a sialogogue and ductal occlusion in volunteers
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2008; 81(967): 583 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Kalinowski, J. T. Heverhagen, E. Rehberg, K. J. Klose, and H.-J. Wagner
Comparative Study of MR Sialography and Digital Subtraction Sialography for Benign Salivary Gland Disorders
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2002; 23(9): 1485 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Becker, F. Marchal, C. D. Becker, P. Dulguerov, G. Georgakopoulos, W. Lehmann, and F. Terrier
Sialolithiasis and Salivary Ductal Stenosis: Diagnostic Accuracy of MR Sialography with a Three-dimensional Extended-Phase Conjugate-Symmetry Rapid Spin-Echo Sequence
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 347 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. A. Drage, J. E. Brown, M. P. Escudier, and M. McGurk
Interventional Radiology in the Removal of Salivary Calculi1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 139 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1994 by the British Institute of Radiology.