BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1993) 66, 506-509
© 1993 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-786-506

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thorley, P J
Right arrow Articles by Rees, M R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thorley, P J
Right arrow Articles by Rees, M R

Does peripheral angioplasty compromise limb blood flow?

P J Thorley, BSc, PhD K L Sheard, DCR, DRI and M R Rees, BSc, MRCP, FRCR

Radionuclide Department, Killingbeck Hospital, York Road, Leeds LS14 6UQ, UK

Isotope limb blood flow studies were carried out using balloon, laser and Kensey catheter techniques to assess the outcome of peripheral angioplasty. Limb blood flow and Doppler ankle-brachial pressure measurements were obtained before angioplasty and at 6 months after angioplasty in a total of 101 angioplastied limbs. A fall in limb blood flow at 6 months was seen in 17% of the angioplastied limbs with no significant difference in the figures for the different types of angioplasty. Limb blood flow was also measured in 53 contralateral untreated limbs, approximately half of the patient group having both legs angioplastied. 25% of untreated limbs showed a fall in limb blood flow. Significantly more of the untreated limbs showed a fall in limb blood flow at 6 months where the contralateral, treated limb did not improve as a result of the angioplasty compared with those patients where the angioplastied leg improved. These results suggest that a lack of improvement in blood flow in the angioplastied limb may not result from failure of the angioplasty but may be the result of some factor, or combination of factors, which adversely affects both the angioplastied and the untreated leg in some patients.

Received for publication August 5, 1992. Accepted for publication February 8, 1993.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1993 by the British Institute of Radiology.