BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1992) 65, 1124-1129
© 1992 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-780-1124

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laskey, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Compston, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laskey, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Compston, J. E.

Comparison of the effect of different reference data on Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers

M. A. Laskey, DPhil A. J. Crisp, FRCP * T. J. Cole, PhD {dagger} and J. E. Compston, FRCP §

Bone Density Unit, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge CB2 2QQ * Department of Rheumatology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ § Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge Clinical School, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ {dagger} MRC Dunn Nutritional Laboratory, Downhams Lane, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1XJ, UK

We have investigated whether the Lunar DPX (software 3.4) and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers have comparable normal reference databases for the spine and femur of white UK and USA subjects. After conversion for systematic differences in absolute bone density values between the two systems, the reference databases were very similar for the spine in young subjects, but there were clear differences in the femur databases of young females and males of all ages. These differences were confirmed by comparing the percent age-matched and young values determined by the two systems for subjects scanned on both systems. Thus the diagnosis and management of a patient could differ, depending on the system used for the bone density measurements.

Key Words: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry • Reference data • Lunar DPX • Hologic QDR-1000

Received for publication May 8, 1992. Revision received June 25, 1992. Accepted for publication July 13, 1992.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
C Christodoulou and C Cooper
What is osteoporosis?
Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2003; 79(929): 133 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
H. D. Nelson, M. Helfand, S. H. Woolf, and J. D. Allan
Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, September 17, 2002; 137(6): 529 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Simmons, S. Barrington, M. J O'Doherty, and A. J Coakley
Bone mineral densitometry in clinical practice
BMJ, November 11, 1995; 311(7015): 1300b - 1301.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Compston, C. Cooper, and J. Kanis
Authors' reply
BMJ, November 11, 1995; 311(7015): 1301a - 1301.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
J E Compston, C Cooper, and J A Kanis
Fortnightly Review: Bone densitometry in clinical practice
BMJ, June 10, 1995; 310(6993): 1507 - 1510.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1992 by the British Institute of Radiology.