BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1992) 65, 1030-1034
© 1992 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-779-1030

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Royle, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Speller, R.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Royle, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Speller, R.D.

Phantoms for evaluating the performance characteristics of bone densitometers

G. J. Royle, BSc, ARCS and R.D. Speller, BSc, ARCS, PhD

Medical Physics Department, University College London, 11–20 Capper Street, London WC1 E 6JA, UK

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

Osteoporosis is characterized by a gradual loss of osseous tissue within the framework of the bone, which lowers bone strength and so increases the risk of fracture. A variety of techniques exist for identifying early bone loss, such as single- or dual-photon absorptiometry (SPA, DP A), quantitative computed tomography (QCT), etc. (Speller et al, 1989). Those commonly employed concentrate on the rate of decrease in bone density or bone mineral content within a particular site. The skeletal sites that become most susceptible to fracture are those with high trabecular content, namely the distal radius, the femoral neck and the lumbar vertebrae. For diagnosis of osteoporosis serial density measurements need to be performed at regular intervals over a period of many months. The frequency at which measurements are performed must be determined by the precision of the machine as compared with the decrease in bone density over that period of time. The reported rates of bone loss for normal post-menopausal women are 1.2% per year for trabecular bone (vertebral QCT measurements; Cann et al, 1985) and 0.9% per year for cortical bone (SPA measurements of mid-radius; Mazess, 1982). Therefore, the precision of the method must be sufficient to allow the machine to detect the small changes in bone density that occur in the space of a few months. Thus, knowledge of the precision and accuracy of the machine is essential. All systems when installed are supplied with a calibration phantom.

Key Words: Phantoms • Bone density • Osteoporosis

Received for publication October 24, 1991. Revision received February 27, 1992. Accepted for publication May 6, 1992.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1992 by the British Institute of Radiology.