BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1992) 65, 594-597
© 1992 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-775-594

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cozens, N. J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Winney, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cozens, N. J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Winney, R. J.

Conventional 15 G needle technique for renal biopsy compared with ultrasound-guided spring-loaded 18 G needle biopsy

N. J. A. Cozens, DMRD J. T. Murchison, MRCP P. L. Allan, FRCR and R. J. Winney, FRCP (Ed) *

Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK * Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Two techniques for percutaneous renal biopsy were retrospectively reviewed to assess their relative safety and efficacy. Ultrasound localization of the kidney by a radiologists, with subsequent biopsy performed by a renal physician using a hand-held 15 G cutting needle (Tru-Cut), was compared with biopsy performed by a radiologist using an 18 G cutting needle with a springloaded biopsy device (Biopty) and real-time ultrasound guidance. The smaller needle with real-time ultrasound is more reliable at retrieving an adequate specimen for histological examination (93%) than the "conventional" technique (79%). Fewer complications occurred in the Biopty group although the difference did not reach statistical significance. The average length of stay in hospital was significantly shorter for elective biopsies with the Biopty device (1.80 compared with 2.93 nights, p < 0.01). We recommend the use of the Biopty device with an 18 G needle and real-time ultrasound guidance as the method of choice for percutaneous renal biopsy.

Key Words: Needle biopsy • Kidney • Ultrasound




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
K. Bramham, H.D. Mistry, L. Poston, L.C. Chappell, and A.J. Thompson
The non-invasive biopsy--will urinary proteomics make the renal tissue biopsy redundant?
QJM, August 1, 2009; 102(8): 523 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. Gesualdo, L. Cormio, G. Stallone, B. Infante, A. M. D. Palma, P. D. Carri, M. Cignarelli, O. Lamacchia, S. Iannaccone, S. D. Paolo, et al.
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy in supine antero-lateral position: A new approach for obese and non-obese patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 971 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Cluzel, F. Martinez, M. F. Bellin, Y. Michalik, H. Beaufils, C. Jouanneau, O. Lucidarme, G. Deray, and P. A. Grenier
Transjugular versus Percutaneous Renal Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Parenchymal Disease: Comparison of Sampling Effectiveness and Complications
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 689 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1992 by the British Institute of Radiology.