BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1992) 65, 570-575
© 1992 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-775-570

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metcalfe, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Metcalfe, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. A.

A study of the relationship between routine ultrasound quality assurance parameters and subjective operator image assessment

S. C. Metcalfe, HNC and J. A. Evans, BSc, MSc, PhD

Department of Medical Physics, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

Comparisons have been made between a number of routine quality assurance (QA) measurements and a number of related subjective aspects of image quality. These comparisons between lateral resolution and perceived definition, dynamic range and subjective grey-level assessment, and slice thickness and overall image quality appraisal showed very poor correlation. We deduce from this that other QA parameters are needed to quantify good image quality as denned by the operators.

Key Words: Ultrasound • Quality assurance • Subjective perception







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1992 by the British Institute of Radiology.