BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1992) 65, 528-535
© 1992 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-774-528

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cowen, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, G. J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cowen, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, G. J. S.

A preliminary investigation of the imaging performance of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography using a new design of mammographic quality control test object

A. R. Cowen, BSc D. S. Brettle, BSc. N. J. Coleman, BA and G. J. S. Parkin, BSc, DMRD, FRCR *

FAXIL, The University of Leeds, Department of Medical Physics, Wellcome Wing * Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

Leeds Test Object TOR[MAM] has been designed to supplement the current FAXIL mammography test object TOR[MAX]. It contains a range of details that have a more natural radiographic appearance and has been designed as a test that more closely approximates the image quality achieved in clinical mammography. Physical aspects of the design and implementation of TOR[MAM] are presented. The TOR[MAM] has been used in a preliminary physical evaluation of the comparative image qualities produced by conventional (screen–film) and photostimulable phosphor computed mammography and the results are discussed. TOR[MAX] results are also presented. The influence of digital image processing (enhancement) on the image quality of computed mammograms is also considered. The results presented indicate the sensitivity of TOR[MAM].

Key Words: Mammography test object • Computed radiography

Received for publication June 18, 1991. Revision received November 11, 1991. Accepted for publication January 14, 1992.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C J Kotre, I P Birch, and K J Robson
Anomalous image quality phantom scores in magnification mammography: evidence of phase contrast enhancement
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2002; 75(890): 170 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1992 by the British Institute of Radiology.