BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1992) 65, 507-509
© 1992 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-774-507

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. D.

Audit in action: significant reduction of double-contrast barium enema screening time with no loss of examination quality

D. Horton, MB, BS A. M. Cook, FRCR and A. D. Taylor, FRCR

Department of Radiology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Kingston upon Hull HU3 2JZ, UK

The double-contrast barium enema is an examination of high radiation exposure to the patient. As part of a departmental audit, our own fluoroscopic screening times were being recorded. A study was undertaken to see if a determined effort could reduce the screening time without having a detrimental effect on the quality of the examinations. Methods of screening time reduction were identified and then implemented by two radiologists. In the period before the study the average screening time for radiologists A and B was 2.6 min and 3.2 min, respectively (over 56 examinations). After implementation of the changes, the average screening time for both was 0.9 min (over 50 examinations). This is a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.01). The examinations were assessed independently by a gastroradiologist. No difference in the quality of the examinations was identified. We conclude that a significant reduction of screening time for the double-contrast barium enema can be achieved without loss of examination quality.

Key Words: Barium enema • Screening time

Received for publication August 27, 1991. Revision received November 25, 1991. Accepted for publication January 14, 1992.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R E Morrell, A T Rogers, J C Jobling, and K E Shakespeare
Barium enema: use of increased copper filtration to optimize dose and image quality
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2004; 77(914): 116 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G J Kemerink, A C W Borstlap, M J Frantzen, F W Schultz, J Zoetelief, and J M A van Engelshoven
Patient and occupational dosimetry in double contrast barium enema examinations
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2001; 74(881): 420 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1992 by the British Institute of Radiology.