BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1992) 65, 162-166
© 1992 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-770-162

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bednarek, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bednarek, D. R.

Minimizing radiation dose to patient and staff during fluoroscopic, nasoenteral tube insertions

Stephen Rudin, PhD * and Daniel R. Bednarek, PhD

Department of Radiology, State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 462 Grider Street, Buffalo, New York 14215, USA

Correspondence: * Author for correspondence.

It is possible to reduce greatly fluoroscopic radiation dose if some image degradation is acceptable. Since the fluoroscopic image during nasoenteral tube placements is used for guidance and not for diagnosis, a lower contrast image with increased quantum mottle can be easily tolerated. The three methods to reduce the radiation dose rate that were investigated consisted of removing the antiscatter grid, increasing the diameter of the optical aperture controlling the percentage of light reaching the television camera from the image intensifier output phosphor, and setting the fluoroscopic mA to the minimum value so that the kVp could be maximized. Fluoroscopic frozen video frames of a clinical tube insertion comparing the images with and without the dose-saving techniques are presented. Measurements of the radiation dose rates using a Plexiglas phantom show that the dose for patient and staff during fluoroscopic-guided nasoenteral tube placements can be reduced by over a factor of 10 without significantly adversely affecting the actual placement procedure.

Key Words: Radiation dose reduction • Fluoroscopy • Nasoenteral tube insertion

Received for publication May 13, 1991. Revision received August 28, 1991. Accepted for publication September 20, 1991.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1992 by the British Institute of Radiology.