BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1992) 65, 140-142
© 1992 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-770-140

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korogi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hatanaka, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korogi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hatanaka, Y.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: pain during balloon inflation

Yukunori Korogi, MD Mutsumasa Takahashi, MD Hiromasa Bussaka, MD and Yoshimi Hatanaka, MD

Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, 1–1–1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860, Japan

The pain during the balloon dilatation of angioplasty was evaluated prospectively to assess its clinical significance. In 54 angioplasties, no pain was observed in 54%, mild pain in 20%, moderate pain in 11% and severe pain in 15%. Moderate or severe pain was observed in 39% of 28 iliac angioplasties and in 7% of 14 femoral angioplasties. There was a significant difference between the two groups. We did not find any significant correlation between the severity of pain and stenotic ratio before angioplasty. Severe pain may be a warning of severe dissection; in our study, all severe dissections were accompanied by severe pain without arterial rupture.

Key Words: Arteries • Transluminal angioplasty • Angiography • Complication • Arteries • Stenosis

Received for publication November 20, 1990. Accepted for publication August 23, 1991.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1992 by the British Institute of Radiology.