BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1992) 65, 92
© 1992 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-769-92-b

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Das, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kase, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Das, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kase, K. R.

Dosimetric accuracy at low monitor unit settings

Indra J. Das and Kenneth R. Kase

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA 01655, USA

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

In his letter, Bomford has pointed out some concerns about our recent paper, Das et al (1991). Let us state that in the paper we do not suggest that typical patient's treatments are likely to be jeopardized because of low monitor unit settings. In fact, we state in the conclusions that "...in terms of total target dose, the error may be insignificant. Only when the treatment is made up of small MU exposures..." is the error possibly of significance. This situation should arise only rarely, but the user should be aware of the potential for error. Increasing the exposure time may be one of the ways to reduce the error, but this requires reducing pulse repetition frequency (PRF) which may not be readily achievable with all medical accelerators.

Received for publication August 15, 1991. Accepted for publication September 4, 1991.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1992 by the British Institute of Radiology.