BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1991) 64, 547-548
© 1991 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-64-762-547

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mills, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Martin-Smith, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mills, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Martin-Smith, P.

Assessment of a radiotherapy beam analyser

J. A. Mills, PhD and P. Martin-Smith, MSc

Department of Clinical Physics and Bioengineering, Radiotherapy Centre, Walsgrave Hospital, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

A Protea Systems Corporation Radiation Beam Analyser (RBA-3) was acquired by this department with a view to providing non-Physics personnel with an easyto- use system to monitor both photon and electron output. The manufacturer describes the RBA-3 as not only fulfilling the above requirement reliably but also as providing a check on field flatness and symmetry. It is one of several commercially available systems for this type of application.

Having acquired the RBA-3 and made appropriate Perspex build-up, its performance was assessed. The accuracy and precision of the RBA-3 was compared with the standard routine calibration facilities used in the department.

Standard dosimetry calibrations and output checks are made using both NE 2570 and NE 2500/IONEX electrometers with NE 2571 graphite chambers. Machine calibrations are maintained in accordance with uncertainties specified in ICRU 24 and are done in the standard manner. A 10 cm x 10 cm field is set at a source-skin distance (SSD) equal to the source to axis distance (SAD) of high energy machines. The chamber is placed 5 cm deep in a closed water phantom which has been cross calibrated against an open water phantom. Field symmetry is monitored weekly using the closed water phantom and monthly using a full field inair scanner. The flatness of the accelerators at Coventry are in compliance with the IEC specification (1979) which concerns the uniformity variation across a field area defined geometrically relative to field edges determined at 50% of the central axis dose.

Key Words: Beam analyser • Flatness monitor • Output check

Received for publication June 1, 1990. Revision received October 1, 1990.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1991 by the British Institute of Radiology.