BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1991) 64, 539-546
© 1991 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-64-762-539

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calzado, A.
Right arrow Articles by González, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calzado, A.
Right arrow Articles by González, L.

Estimation of doses to patients from "complex" conventional X-ray examinations

A. Calzado, PhD E. Vañó, PhD P. Morán, PhD C. Castellote, PhD * S. Ruiz, MD and L. González, PhD

Cátedra de Física Médica, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Medicina, Pabellón II, Planta 4a, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain * Departamento de Radiología, Hospital Militar Central "Gómez Ulla", Glorieta dél Ejercito, s/n, 28047 Madrid, Spain

A numerical method has been developed to estimate the organ doses and effective dose-equivalent for patients undergoing three "complex" examinations (barium meal, barium enema and intravenous urography). The separation of radiological procedures into a set of standard numerical views is based on the use of Monte Carlo conversion factors and measurements within a Remab phantom. The radiation doses measured in a phantom for such examinations have been compared with the predictions of the "numerical" method. Dosimetric measurements with thermoluminescent dosemeters attached to the patient's skin along with measurements of the dose-area product during the examination have enabled us to derive organ doses and to estimate the effective dose-equivalent. Mean frequency weighted values of dose-area product, energy imparted to the patient, doses to a set of organs and effective dose-equivalent in the area of Madrid are reported. Comparisons of the results with those from similar surveys in other countries have been made.

Key Words: Dosimetry • Radiodiagnostics • Phantom • Monte Carlo • Radiation protection

Received for publication July 1, 1990. Revision received October 1, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh
Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. A. Jaffe, A. M. Gaca, S. Delaney, T. T. Yoshizumi, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and D. P. Frush
Radiation Doses from Small-Bowel Follow-Through and Abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn's Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1015 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E Yakoumakis, I A Tsalafoutas, D Nikolaou, I Nazos, E Koulentianos, and C. Proukakis
Differences in effective dose estimation from dose-area product and entrance surface dose measurements in intravenous urography
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2001; 74(884): 727 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G J Kemerink, A C W Borstlap, M J Frantzen, F W Schultz, J Zoetelief, and J M A van Engelshoven
Patient and occupational dosimetry in double contrast barium enema examinations
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2001; 74(881): 420 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1991 by the British Institute of Radiology.