This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bull, A. R. Articles by Campbell, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bull, A. R. Articles by Campbell, M. J.

Assessment of the psychological impact of a breast screening programme

Yorkshire Regional Health Authority, Park Parade, Harrogate, HG1 5AH, UK ^* Department of Medical Statistics and Computing, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO9 4XY, UK

In order to assess the psychological effect of mammographic screening, questionnaires (which included psychometric tests) were sent to 750 women at invitation and, 6 weeks after screening, to 420 women normal after the first mammograph, to 240 women normal after special assessment, and to 68 women normal after open biopsy. Increasing degree of the investigation was associated both with increasing frequency of breast self examination (10% were practising breast self-examination at least once a week before screening compared with 24% for women after special assessment and 35% of women who had had an open biopsy (p < 0.001)), and with greater confidence that any malignancy in the breast would have been found. Psychometric scores showed no increase of general levels of anxiety or depression in the screened groups. For anxiety, percentages abnormal were 5, 4, 2 and 6 for the four groups, respectively, and for depression the percentages abnormal were 5, 4, 4 and 6, respectively; 10% of screened women were more anxious about having breast cancer as a result of the screening. At least 10% of women proceeding to open biopsy of benign lesions require professional counselling and support. Psychological ill effects were not detected by the psychometric test among women who did not proceed to this final investigation. Behavioural changes did suggest a raised awareness or fear of potential cancer among the screened population.

Key Words: Psychological effects • Mammographic screening

Received for publication January 1, 1990. Revision received May 1, 1990.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Sala, M. Comas, F. Macia, J. Martinez, M. Casamitjana, and X. Castells Implementation of Digital Mammography in a Population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program: Effect of Screening Round on Recall Rate and Cancer Detection Radiology, July 1, 2009; 252(1): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. T. Brewer, T. Salz, and S. E. Lillie Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive Mammograms Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 502 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Armstrong, E. Moye, S. Williams, J. A. Berlin, and E. E. Reynolds Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 516 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Cullen, M. D. Schwartz, W. F. Lawrence, J. V. Selby, and J. S. Mandelblatt Short-Term Impact of Cancer Prevention and Screening Activities on Quality of Life J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 22(5): 943 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M C van Maarle, M E A Stouthard, and G J Bonsel Quality of life in a family based genetic cascade screening programme for familial hypercholesterolaemia: a longitudinal study among participants J. Med. Genet., January 1, 2003; 40(1): e3 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. A. Olivotto, C. Bancej, V. Goel, J. Snider, R. G. McAuley, B. Irvine, L. Kan, D. Mirsky, M. J. Sabine, R. McGilly, et al. Waiting times from abnormal breast screen to diagnosis in 7 Canadian provinces Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 1, 2001; 165(3): 277 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Ringash Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 1, 2001; 164(4): 469 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Christiansen, F. Wang, M. B. Barton, W. Kreuter, J. G. Elmore, A. E. Gelfand, and S. W. Fletcher Predicting the Cumulative Risk of False-Positive Mammograms J Natl Cancer Inst, October 18, 2000; 92(20): 1657 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Fletcher False-Positive Screening Mammograms: Good News, but More To Do Ann Intern Med, July 6, 1999; 131(1): 60 - 62. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Elmore, M. B. Barton, V. M. Moceri, S. Polk, P. J. Arena, and S. W. Fletcher Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations N. Engl. J. Med., April 16, 1998; 338(16): 1089 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Ong, J. Austoker, and A. Brouwer Evaluation of the written information sent to women who are called back for further investigation of breast screening in the UK Health Education Journal, January 1, 1996; 55(4): 413 - 429. [Abstract] [PDF]