BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1991) 64, 494-497
© 1991 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-64-762-494

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perring, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perring, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, I.

Automated measurement of tumour extent in patients with colorectal liver metastases from X-ray computed tomography

S. Perring, MA T. M. Hunt, FRCS * J. S. Fleming, PhD, FIPSM R. M. Blaquiere, FRCR {dagger} and I. Taylor, MD, FRCS

Department of Medical Physics, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, S09 4XY, UK * University Surgical Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, S09 4XY, UK {dagger} Department of Radiology, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, S09 4XY, UK

Tumour burden is a significant prognostic factor in patients with colorectal liver metastases, and can be staged according to percentage hepatic replacement (PHR), but accurate measurements of PHR are difficult to obtain. We have used an automated computerized technique to isolate tumour and measure PHR from computed tomography images of 22 patients. Tumour identification was achieved by establishing local histogram-based thresholds at liver-tumour boundaries displaying clear bimodal histogram distributions. There was a significant association between measured PHR and independent visual estimates of PHR stage defined in quartiles (p < 0.001). When the measured value of PHR differed from the PHR stage, the visual estimate was always higher. The accuracy of PHR measurement was assessed on simulated liver computed tomography images. It seems likely that visual estimates of PHR from computed tomography images tend to overestimate tumour extent. The automated technique is probably more accurate and will be useful for assessing and monitoring patients.

Key Words: Computed tomography • Liver metastases • Tumour staging

Received for publication July 1, 1990. Revision received January 1, 1991.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1991 by the British Institute of Radiology.