BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1991) 64, 183-184
© 1991 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-64-758-183-c

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, S.

Central venous catheter placement for intravenous digital subtraction angiography: an assessment of technical problems and success rate

S. Sharma

Department of Cardio-Vascular Radiology, Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiothoracic Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

I read the article by Barber (1989) with great interest. I compliment the author for highlighting the frequently encountered but rarely reported problems related to central venous catheterization. Venous spasm in the arm is, indeed, a problem in catheterizing the cephalic vein, especially if J-guide wire is used. Some time ago, I switched over to using RadiofocusTM guide wire M (Terumo Corp., Tokyo) for catheterization of the right atrium by upper extremity venous route. In the last 100 consecutive unselected patients who underwent intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV-DSA) by this route, I have used this guide wire and have seen no instance of dissection and only two instances of venous spasm, both related to the cephalic venous puncture.

Received for publication September 1, 1990.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1991 by the British Institute of Radiology.