BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1990) 63, 564-567
© 1990 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-63-751-564

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guibelalde, E.
Right arrow Articles by Llorca, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guibelalde, E.
Right arrow Articles by Llorca, A. L.

Quality assurance of viewing boxes: proposal for establishing minimum requirements and results from a Spanish quality control programme

E. Guibelalde, PhD E. Vañó, PhD and A. L. Llorca, MD

Catedra de Física Médica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

The Medical Physics Group at the Complutense University of Madrid has undertaken a project, during the last 3 years, under a CEC contract on "Optimization of Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Radiology" (Vañó, 1989) in which a pilot programme of Quality Control (QC) was included (Gonzalez, 1989). Exhaustive patient and occupational dose measurements showed differences between the test results from similar equipment. This fact moved us to set up a Quality Control Programme (Guibelalde & Llorca, 1989), and then several Quality Assurance (QA) programmes.

The necessity to establish minimum performance requirements for image quality, and the convenience of denning objective parameters to make possible further advances in the reduction of patient doses and optimization of image quality, has been pointed out at several Workshops of the Commission of European Communities (CEC) on Image Quality in Diagnostic Radiology. A Working Document of the CEC (1989) has recently been issued emphasizing the need to develop appropriate quality criteria. The aim of these activities is to produce standards and quality criteria that will provide a framework, throughout the European Community, for producing images with minimum patient dose and maximum quality. Efforts to ensure the best quality and consistency of viewing boxes must aid these objectives.

The brightness and uniformity of viewing boxes are two factors that can be measured in absolute units. These factors are not influenced by other elements of image quality control and, therefore, can be used for comparisons between different centres.

Received for publication July 1, 1989.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C J Kotre
An investigation of search pattern extent in the threshold contrast detection task
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 79(941): 437 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E McCarthy and P C Brennan
Viewing conditions for diagnostic images in three major Dublin hospitals: a comparison with WHO and CEC recommendations
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2003; 76(902): 94 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1990 by the British Institute of Radiology.