BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published online before print May 26, 2009
British Journal of Radiology 2009, doi:10.1259/bjr/62898427

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KUMAR, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KUMAR, K
© 2009 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

Abnormally increased uptake of 18F-FDG in the forearm and hand following intra-arterial injection — hot forearm and hot hand signs

K KUMAR


   Abstract

To aim of this study is to describe the appearance of intra-arterial administration of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). The effect of this finding on the standard uptake values (SUVs) is also briefly discussed. Three cases of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) scans, detected over 2 years (2004–2006), with different presentations producing hot forearm and hot hand signs are described. It was shown that intra-arterial injections of 18F-FDG producing "the hot forearm sign" and the hot hand sign" are similar to the glove pattern of uptake noted following intra-arterial administration of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate. Following intra-arterial injection, uptake of 18F-FDG is accentuated by hypoxia and exercise. A comparison is also made with the pattern of soft-tissue uptake seen following true intravenous injections with similar pre-injection vein enhancement techniques to the intra-arterial injections. Evaluation of the maximum intensity projection (MIP) and transaxial PET/CT fusion images of the arm, forearm and hand helps to confirm the diagnosis. Hands are often not included in PET/CT imaging and therefore cases might be missed. In conclusion, intra-arterial injection of 18F-FDG produces a "hot forearm sign" and "hot hand sign". Hands are often not included in PET/CT imaging, and therefore the presence of hot forearm sign should suggest further investigation. It should be mentioned in the radiology report, as it may alter the sensitivity and specificity of the SUV value.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.