BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1989) 62, B149-B156
© 1989 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-62-741-B149

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

BIR Bulletin

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

Ask searching questions about the safety of diagnostic ultrasound and you will come up with some odd conundrums. Even though, after the plain radiograph, ultrasound is now much the most common form of imaging examination, no-one has found reproducible evidence of even minor harm to patients, and yet some scanners emit ultrasound pulses with amplitudes in the range used in commercial lithotripters, others have beam intensities in the range used (with apparent effect) in physiotherapy, and yet others have been found with transducer surface temperatures up to 80°C.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1989 by the British Institute of Radiology.