BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1989) 62, 838-842
© 1989 British Institute of Radiology
doi:

Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mustafa, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Janeczek, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mustafa, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Janeczek, J.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 62, Issue 741 838-842, Copyright © 1989 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Organ doses from cardiac and carotid digital subtraction angiography

AA Mustafa and J Janeczek
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University.

Estimates of mean organ doses from cardiac and carotid digital subtraction angiography (DSA) are obtained from measurements done using a Rando-Alderson tissue-equivalent phantom. Thermoluminescent dosemeter chips and discs were calibrated and used for all measurements in the primary and scattered radiation fields. Skin doses as well as mean doses received by the thyroid, lung, lens of the eye, breast, uterus and the ovaries were measured. A 30 degree right anterior oblique (RAO) cardiac DSA study produces a beam entrance dose of about 121 mGy at a rate of 0.48 mGy/frame. The highest mean organ dose from cardiac DSA was to the lung with a value of 14.4 mGy. The rest of the organs received doses below 1 mGy. In carotid DSA, the mean entrance doses resulted from the RAO, left anterior oblique, and the Towne's view projections give an average of 168 mGy at a rate of 8.4 mGy/frame. The highest mean organ dose from the three projections, 21 mGy, was received by the thyroid. The uterus and ovaries received the lowest doses from both procedures with values below 0.04 mGy. Patient and phantom surface exposures were compared using an exposure area product system. Hence, exposure conditions used for measuring organ doses on the phantom were adjusted to resemble those used for patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
L. Struelens, F. Vanhavere, H. Bosmans, R. Van Loon, and H. Mol
Skin dose measurements on patients for diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology: a multicentre study
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 143 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. T. Ilgit, N. Meric, D. Bor, I. Öznur, O. Konus, and S. Isik
Lens of the Eye: Radiation Dose in Balloon Dacryocystoplasty
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 54 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1989 by the British Institute of Radiology.