| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 62, Issue 741 813-816, Copyright © 1989 by British Institute of Radiology
ARTICLES |
JM Stevens, S Barter, R Kerslake, A Schneidau, C Barber and DJ Thomas
St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, London.
Data from a multicentre survey based on three London teaching hospitals on the relative safety and clinical utility of intravenous carotid digital subtraction angiography (DSA) over intra-arterial DSA and conventional carotid angiography are presented. The incidence of stroke during intra-arterial DSA was 0.7% (n = 538) and during conventional angiography was 0.8% (n = 780). The incidence of stroke during intravenous DSA was zero (n = 3710). When it constituted the initial investigation, intravenous DSA achieved a 93.8% replacement value over intra-arterial studies as a whole (n = 474) and 89% replacement value for patients having carotid endarterectomy (n = 99). It was also noted that the installation of DSA equipment at one unit coincided with a sixfold increase in the number of carotid angiographic examinations and an almost threefold increase in carotid endarterectomies.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |