BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1989) 62, 807-812
© 1989 British Institute of Radiology
doi:

Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by den Hartog Jager, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by van Haastert, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by den Hartog Jager, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by van Haastert, M.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 62, Issue 741 807-812, Copyright © 1989 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Late radiation injury of the rectum and sigmoid colon: barium enema findings in 92 patients

FC den Hartog Jager, P Cohen and M van Haastert
Department of Gastroenterology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.

We reviewed the findings on 169 contrast enema examinations in 92 patients with late radiation injury of the rectum and sigmoid colon, encountered over an 11-year period. The diagnosis was made by rectosigmoidoscopy in all patients. The limitations and pitfalls of both examinations were studied. The mean interval between radiotherapy and diagnosis was 1.7 years and the mean follow-up period was 3.5 years. The main radiological features varied from normal findings (15% of the initial examinations) to decreased distensibility of the bowel wall, intestinal fixation, mucosal and contour abnormalities, ulceration, stenoses and fistula formation. During follow-up, the number of all pathological findings increased. Pre-stenotic dilatation of the descending colon was always absent. The contrast enema examinations and endoscopies were found to be complementary. The barium enema showed the extent of the disease and accurately identified stenoses and fistulas, but underdiagnosed ulceration and overdiagnosed malignancy. Endoscopy allowed unequivocal detection of mucosal damage, especially ulceration, and was accurate in showing stenoses but sometimes failed to demonstrate fistulas. Moreover, in 25% of examinations it was impossible to examine the entire abnormal area.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1989 by the British Institute of Radiology.