BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1989) 62, 573-581
© 1989 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-62-739-573

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rickards, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rickards, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S. N.

Percutaneous interventional uroradiology

D. Rickards, MRCS, FFRDSA, FRCR * and S. N. Jones, MRCP, FRCR

Department of Radiology, The Middlesex Hospital, London W1N 8AA

Correspondence: * Author for correspondence.

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

In the recent past, intervention in the urinary tract was the sole domain of the urological surgeon or the general surgeon with an interest in urology. With the advance of radiologically-guided interventional techniques, the approach is now multidisciplinary, involving surgeons, radiologists and pathologists. Some traditional methods of treating common urological complaints are now defunct. The implications of this are profound. They include shorter hospital inpatient stays, less use of general anaesthesia, easier planned patient management and, above all, decreased cost of patient treatment. Both patient morbidity and mortality have been reduced and, on the whole, the procedures are more acceptable.

Technology is advancing rapidly and newly acquired skills are often rather short-lived as primary therapeutic tools. For instance, extracorporeal lithotripters have reduced the demand for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, but such skills must still be practised and perfected for the treatment of complications and because not all patients are suitable.

This review concentrates on percutaneous renal work (Table I) and stresses current concepts. Specific interventional procedures are not described in detail.

Many interventional procedures, e.g. antegrade pyelography, can be performed on fluoroscopy units readily available in all X-ray departments. Ideally, a dedicated interventional suite is needed to satisfy both urologist and radiologist. The interventional room itself needs to be serviced by a recovery area and a nursing station where sterile trolleys can be prepared.

Received for publication July 1, 1988. Revision received February 1, 1989.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1989 by the British Institute of Radiology.