BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published online before print September 1, 2009
British Journal of Radiology 2009, doi:10.1259/bjr/56838652
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ALGIN, O
Right arrow Articles by PARLAK, M
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ALGIN, O
Right arrow Articles by PARLAK, M
© 2009 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

The contribution of 3D-CISS and contrast-enhanced MR cisternography in detecting cerebrospinal fluid leak in patients with rhinorrhoea

O ALGIN 1, B HAKYEMEZ 1, G GOKALP 1, T OZCAN 2, E KORFALI 2, M PARLAK 1

1 Department of Radiology, Uludag University School of Medicine, Turkey
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Uludag University School of Medicine, Turkey


   Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the value of unenhanced (three-dimensional constructive interference in steady-state (3D-CISS)) and contrast-enhanced MR cisternography (CE-MRC) in detecting the localisation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak in patients with rhinorrhoea. 17 patients with active or suspected CSF rhinorrhoea were included in the study. 3D-CISS sequences in coronal and sagittal planes and fat-supressed T1 weighted spin-echo sequences in three planes before and after intrathecal contrast media adminstration were obtained. Images were obtained of the cribriform plate and sphenoid sinus. In addition, high-resolution CT (HRCT) was performed in order to evaluate the bony elements. The leak was shown in 9/17 patients with 3D-CISS and 10/17 patients with CE-MRC. The leak from the cribriform plate to the nasal cavity in six patients and from the sphenoid sinus in four patients was nicely shown by CE-MRC. Eight of those patients were surgically treated, whereas spontaneous regression of the symptoms in two precluded any intervention. The leak localisations shown with CE-MRC were fully compatible with surgical results. The sensitivities of HRCT, 3D-CISS and CE-MRC for showing CSF leakage were 88%, 76% and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, 3D-CISS is a non-invasive and reliable technique and should be the first-choice method to localise CSF leak. CE-MRC is helpful in conditions when there is no leak or in complicated cases with a positive {beta}2 transferrin measurement.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.