BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1982) 55, B25-B30
© 1982 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-55-654-B25

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

BIR Bulletin

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

The superiority of non-ionic contrast media, especially metrizamide, over conventional media (Cardioconray and Urografin 370) has been shown with regard to the extent and duration of hypotension following aortic injection. This is likely to be of especial significance in those patients with generalized arteriosclerosis and limited cardiac reserve. Metrizamide (370 mg iodine/ml) causes a less marked and shorter fall in blood pressure than lopamidol (370 mg iodine/ml) and has less effect on the heart rate. The non-ionic contrast agents, metrizamide and lopamidol and also Hexabrix, cause much less pain and sensation of heat in the legs than Cardioconray and Urografin 370. Metrizamide has the disadvantage of needing to be dissolved from its powder form and is very expensive.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1982 by the British Institute of Radiology.