BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1981) 54, 24-28
© 1981 British Institute of Radiology
doi:

Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hay, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cowen, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hay, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cowen, A. R.

The British Journal of Radiology, Vol 54, Issue 637 24-28, Copyright © 1981 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

A physical assessment of the imaging performance of panel-type X-ray image intensifier

GA Hay and AR Cowen

The performance of a commercial panel-type X-ray image intensifier has been investigated by physical methods, both objective and subjective. The objective measurements show that the manufacturer's claims are justified, except perhaps in regard to contrast loss. The subjective measurements reveal that the conversion factor ("gain") of the device is such that dark-adaptation is not necessary, though best results are obtained in a nearly dark room. Hence the device confers a significant advantage, both in information and in dose to the patient, over traditional fluoroscopy. However, the conversion factor is nearly three orders of magnitude smaller than that of a conventional X-ray image-intensifier television system. Therefore, at modern fluoroscopic exposure rates, the eye is operating at light levels at which its own deficiencies set a limit to the perceptible information. To equal the performance of modern fluoroscopy the exposure rate to the intensifier must be increased to about 20 times the value customary in modern fluoroscopy. This can be done only by increasing the X-ray factors (kV and mA), resulting in a corresponding increase in dose to the patient of about one order of magnitude. Such an increase is in many circumstance unacceptable.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1981 by the British Institute of Radiology.