BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1968) 41, 586-596
© 1968 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-41-488-586

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westerman, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westerman, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, J. F.

Physical comparison of gamma camera and two-headed scanner: figures of merit and times required for threshold detection of spherical sources

B. Westerman, Ph.D. M.Sc M. Stead, B.Sc and J. F. Fowler, Ph.D., M.Sc, F.Inst.P.

Medical Physics Department, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W.12

Physical comparisons are described between a scintillation camera and a two-headed scanner for their efficiency in detecting radioactive spheres in tanks of water containing radioactivity at different concentrations. For these comparisons, the previously defined figure of merit has to be modified to use "counts recorded per integrating time, i.e. time spent over the abnormal region" instead of "per minute". A new quantity, "merit-time-product", is defined and used for this purpose. It is then possible to compare scanners moving at different speeds with each other or with cameras, on the same basis.

Results are presented showing the total times required for each device to scan an area, so that a given level of significance is achieved in the threshold detection of active spheres in the presence of background radioactivity. The scintillation camera requires shorter times. The differences are small for 131I, but exceed factors of 20 in overall time for 99mTc. These factors decrease with depth in the scintillation camera, from 20 to 30 at 7 cm to about 10 at 10 cm depth. Possibly the most striking difference between the camera and the two-head scanner is the high efficiency of the camera for relatively shallow tumours and the rapid decrease of efficiency with depth.

Received for publication January 1, 1968.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1968 by the British Institute of Radiology.