BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1968) 41, 155-156
© 1968 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-41-482-155-b

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boddy, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boddy, K.

Whole body monitors

Keith Boddy

Scottish Research Reactor Centre, East Kilbride, Glasgow

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

As pointed out by Godfrey, Vennart, Cottrall and Trott (1968) and, of course, by many other workers including ourselves (Boddy, 1965; 1966), factors such as independence of source geometry, constancy of background, comfort of the patient and flexibility for various monitoring techniques must be considered in assessing the performance of a whole body monitor as well as high sensitivity and cost. It is not always feasible, however, to do justice to all of these factors in the same communication!







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1968 by the British Institute of Radiology.