BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1967) 40, 230-231
© 1967 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-40-471-230

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mowat, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mowat, P. D.

Pneumoperitoneum Following Double Contrast Enema

P. D. Mowat, M.B., B.S. (Queensland)

St. Thomas' Hospital, London, S.E.1

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

Intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal extravasation of barium following rupture of the colon during the filling stage of barium enema examination has been described by many authors. The literature to date was summarised by Samuel and Pyle in 1960. In the large majority of cases, the perforation is accounted for by injury to the rectum or colon by the enema tube or balloon, or by the presence of gross pathology in the colon, usually carcinoma, diverticulitis, or ulcerative colitis. Perforation is much more frequent when the enema fluid is administered through a colostomy, as the colon is more liable to injury by the enema tube than is the rectum. Whatever the cause, perforation with escape of barium is a serious complication, the mortality being in the region of 50 per cent in most series. The ill effects of the extravated barium are due to bacterial contamination in most cases, but absorption of tannic acid, if this is used, may be a contributory factor, (Portin and Bernhoft, 1963).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1967 by the British Institute of Radiology.