BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1965) 38, 527-532
© 1965 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-38-451-527

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, D.
Right arrow Articles by Roebuck, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, D.
Right arrow Articles by Roebuck, E. J.

The Radioisotope Renogram compared with Intravenous Pyelography as a Screening Test for Patients with Hypertension

Diana Andrews, M.Sc. Victor Parsons, M.A., D.M., M.R.C.P. * and Eric J. Roebuck, M.B., B.S., D.M.R.D., F.F.R.

Departments of Physics, Medicine, and Radiology, Guy's Hospital, London, S.E.1

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

One hundred and sixty-two patients with a sustained diastolic pressure of 110 mm of Hg or more were investigated with 131I renography and intravenous nephropyelography, 28 had arteriography, and 16 divided renal function studies. 20 per cent had abnormalities in both renogram and pyelography and one in three of these warranted surgical intervention. Bilateral symmetrical renal disease cannot be predicted on renography without simultaneous measurements of blood and bladder concentration. No false negatives were found compared with pyelography in the whole series. Renography corrected faulty observation and interpretation of nephropyelograms on three occasions. Renography provides a selection test of accuracy equal to nephro-pyelography for the detection of patients who require further investigation. It has the advantage of speed and a smaller radiation hazard.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1965 by the British Institute of Radiology.