BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1964) 37, 310
© 1964 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-37-436-310

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munro, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Munro, T. R.

Correspondence

T. R. Munro

Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

The contribution of Porter and Berry (1963) to this interesting correspondence might be interpreted to imply that Hewitt and Wilson (1963) were putting forward a two-parameter model for interpretation of the results of radio-therapy. This, alas, is not so; the model involves at least four parameters—D0, n, the oxygen : nitrogen sensitivity ratio m, and the fraction of cells in the tumour that are anoxic, which I shall call f. This last quantity is at least as little amenable to experimental investigation in patients as the host resistance postulated by Cohen (1963), and by assigning appropriate values and assuming that—as may well be the case—f changes during a course of treatment, these parameters can equally well be manipulated so as to explain almost any set of observations. Host resistance is not the only deus ex machina.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1964 by the British Institute of Radiology.