BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1961) 34, 474-487
© 1961 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-34-404-474

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, D. A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, D. A. W.

II. The Anti-reflux Mechanism: Manometric and Radiological Studies

D. A. W. Edwards, M.A., M.D., M.R.C.P. *

Medical Research Council Department of Clinical Research, University College Hospital Medical School and Unit for Research in Gastroenterology, Central Middlesex Hospital, London

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

This paper does not pretend to be a comprehensive review of the contributions made by pressure measurements to the study of the gastrooesophageal junction region, since this has been admirably achieved by Ingelfinger (1958); but it attempts to provide (1) an anatomical and physiological background to some of the changes in the shape of the barium shadow seen during a barium swallow examination and (2) a mechanical explanation of the anti-reflux mechanism. It is largely a record of personal observations but includes a review of experimental work and currently held views which are relevant to the suggestions put forward. Vantrappen, Texter, Barborka and Vandenbroucke (1960) have reviewed the anatomical and physiological aspects of the closing mechanism at the gastro-oesophageal junction.

There must be few areas of the body where method and approach have so much influence on the results obtained. Until recently, for example, the existence of a cardiac sphincter was denied because the anatomist could not demonstrate one; and because the technique of the barium swallow examination minimised the effect of an intrinsic sphincter and emphasised the action of the diaphragm. It is important, therefore, to discuss briefly some of the contributions made by different methods and the limitations of these methods.

* Work undertaken on behalf of the Medical Research Council.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. S. Wolf
Heartburn: The Role of Radiology
JAMA, March 22, 1976; 235(12): 1244 - 1247.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1961 by the British Institute of Radiology.