BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published online before print July 20, 2009
British Journal of Radiology 2009, doi:10.1259/bjr/27674581
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JENA, R
Right arrow Articles by BURNET, N G
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JENA, R
Right arrow Articles by BURNET, N G
© 2009 The British Institute of Radiology

Full paper

A novel algorithm for the morphometric assessment of radiotherapy treatment planning volumes

R JENA 1, N F KIRKBY 2, K E BURTON 1, A C F HOOLE 1, L T TAN 1, N G BURNET 3

1 Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
2 Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
3 University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK


   Abstract

Quantitative assessment of target volume contouring in radiotherapy treatment planning is an important aspect of quality assessment and educational exercises. The Conformity Index (CI) is a volume-based statistic frequently used for this purpose. Although the CI is relatively simple to understand and can be calculated using most treatment planning systems, it does not provide any information on the differences in shape between the two volumes. We present a new morphometric (shape-based) statistic known as the "mean distance to conformity" (MDC). For a specific volume that is being evaluated against a reference volume, the MDC represents the average distance that all outlying points in the volume must be moved in order to achieve perfect conformity with the reference volume. The MDC comprises a component related to under-contouring (where the evaluation volume is smaller than the reference volume) and a component related to over-contouring (where the evaluation extends beyond the reference volume). Furthermore, voxel-by-voxel information on conformity errors can also be displayed using a volume–error histogram. Calculation of MDC statistics is achieved using a three-dimensional grid search algorithm. By using a range of scenarios comprising both theoretical and actual clinical volumes, we demonstrate the increased utility of the MDC for the detection of contouring errors.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 2009 by the British Institute of Radiology.