BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1951) 24, 223-224
© 1951 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-24-280-223

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conway-Hughes, J. H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conway-Hughes, J. H. L.

Two Cases of Meigs' Syndrome

J. H. L. Conway-Hughes, D.M.R.(D), Consultant Radiologist

Isle of Wight Hospital Group

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

The syndrome described by Meigs (1937) consists of ascites and hydrothorax in association with an ovarian tumour. His original series was one of seven cases, all of which were fibromas. Since that time the syndrome has been described in association with most types of ovarian tumour, but only some 50 cases have been recorded in the literature. The occurrence of two cases in this Hospital Group within a few weeks of one another, therefore, appeared to merit recording. The importance of recognising the syndrome lies in two facts, (a) the condition is usually a benign one, and (b) the ascites and hydrothorax clear up immediately following removal of the tumour and repeated aspiration is unnecessary. These two points are well exemplified by our two cases. Case 1 is microscopically a cystadenocarcinoma; it is felt that this must be of very low malignancy as the patient has made an uninterrupted recovery and three months after operation is clinically perfectly well. Simon (1947) has emphasised that the syndrome should not be associated with potentially malignant tumours, but that it can occur followed by relief on removal of the tumour is illustrated by this case. A further case in association with cystadenocarcinoma has been published by Schenck and Eis (1938). Case 2 is microscopically a pseudomucinous cystadenoma. In both cases the hydrothorax had cleared 14 days after operation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1951 by the British Institute of Radiology.