BJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

British Journal of Radiology (1949) 22, 33-43
© 1949 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-22-253-33

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, L. A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, L. A. W.

An Investigation Into Some Factors Affecting X-ray Dose Distribution and its Measurement

R. Oliver, B.Sc. and L. A. W. Kemp, B.Sc., F.Inst.P.

The London Hospital, Whitechapel, E.1

This excerpt was created in the absence of an abstract.

The dose comparator apparatus (Kemp, 1946) has been used to measure backscatter factor and percentage depth dose for various field sizes at 50 cm. and 40 cm. F.S.D., using radiation of approximately 1·0 mm. Cu H.V.L. The results are in fairly good agreement with values given by Quimby and Laurence (1940), but there are considerable deviations (up to 30 per cent.) from the figures given in the Mayneord and Lamerton Survey (1941) for large field areas, the latter giving lower backscatter factors and higher percentage depth dose values at large depths. These deviations are shown to be mainly due to the weight given in the Mayneord and Lamerton Survey to results obtained in wax phantoms.

Various factors affecting measurements in a phantom have been investigated. These factors include the effects of phantom material, of using a large ionization chamber, or a chamber with a heavy metal stem, and of applicator construction. A comparison of results with the same applicator used on different X-ray sets is also given.

It is concluded that measurements with the dose comparator apparatus are free from any significant errors.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING  ALL BIR JOURNALS 
Copyright © 1949 by the British Institute of Radiology.